Dr.VIVEK KUMAR
AIM: TO COMPARE VISUAL OUTCOME OF DIFFERENT TECNIQUES OF SECONDARY LENS IMPLANT.
METHODS: THIS WAS RETROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY, ENROLLED ALL APHAKIC PATIENTS, ALL INFORMATION COLLECTED REGARDING DEMOGRAPHAGY, AETIOLOGY, PRIMARY SURGERY AND COMPLICATIONS. SECONDARY LENS IMPLANTED WITH OR WITHOUT VITRECTOMY USING VARIOUS TYPE OF SECONDARY SURGERIES. ALL DATA EXPORTED FOR EMR AND ANALYSED BY SPSS 22 USING DISCRIPTIVE ANALYSES AND CROSS TABULATION.
RESULT: THIS WAS RETROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY, ENROLLED APHAKIC PATIENTS SINCE 2003-2017 WITH 461(38.5%) FEMALE AND 736(61.45%) MALE, OUR COHORT INCLUDED THE SECONDARY IOL IMPLANTATION BY VIT+ IOL ON REMNANT 1018(85.04%), VIT+SF IOL 122(10.2%), LENS+VIT+SFIOL 3(.25%), VIT FOR LENS DROP +SEC IOL 9(.75%) & VIT+IOL EXCHANGE 13(1.1%).WHEN COMPARED FINAL VISUAL OUTCOME WITH DIFFERENT TECHNIQUES, WE FOUND DIFFERENCE IS SIGNIFICANT (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: VISUAL OUTCOME SIGNIFICANTLY BETTER WITH LENS ON CAPSULAR REMNANT
Leave a Comment